For me, the most symbolic and significant political struggle (amongst
many) taking place in the U.S. at the moment is the fight to stop the
Dakota Access pipeline running close to the the Standing Rock
Reservation. In September 2016, the project was halted pending further
environmental assessments. But two weeks ago President Trump signalled his support for the project, with an executive order. And so now construction is due to begin again.
This conflict is significant because it exemplifies a condition which
I call "ecopsychopathy." There are around 200 hundred classified forms
of mental illness, and this is one I would like to add to the list.
Ecopsychopathy can be described as a "lack of empathy, connection or sense of responsibility to the natural world, resulting in its abuse and exploitation."
The inability to empathise is the major characteristic of psychopathy.
Psychopaths are emotionally disconnected from other people, who are
just objects to them. They have no "fellow-feeling," no ability to feel
pity or guilt. This makes it possible for them to commit acts of cruelty
and exploitation which would be far beyond normal human beings. Since
they have no feelings for others, there is nothing to stop them
inflicting suffering on them, and exploiting them for their own devices.
This is a perfect description of our culture’s attitude to the
natural world. Many of the world’s indigenous peoples feel a connection
to nature which we "civilized" people seem to have lost. Indigenous
people sense a sacredness in nature, feel that they share their being
with it, and so are reluctant to harm it. This is typified by the Lakota
holy man Black Elk, who said "Every step that we take upon the Earth
should be done in a sacred manner; every step should be taken as a
prayer." And it’s also exemplified by the Sioux people's opposition to
the Dakota access pipeline.
On the other hand, the ecopsychopathic attitude of mainstream
American culture sees nature as nothing more than a supply of resources.
Natural things are objects. They only have value inasmuch they can
supply us with raw materials. They aren’t alive, they aren’t sacred, and
they don’t deserve our respect. We can’t empathize with nature, in the
same way that psychopaths can’t empathize with other human beings.
The consequence of this disorder are enormous, massively outweighing
those of any other psychological condition. On an immediate level,
ecopsychopathy results in a degradation of our living environment
which causes dislocation and unease. As the fields of ecopsychology and
ecotherapy have shown, human beings feel a strong sense of connection
to nature. We feel at home in it, because it’s been our home for
hundreds of thousands of years. Contact with nature heals us. Lack of
contact with nature harms us.
On a more macrocosmic level, ecopsychopathy threatens the survival of the human race.
The end point of our exploitative and manipulative attitude towards the
natural world is surely the complete disruption of the fragile
eco-systems on which our life depends. This disruption is underway
already, resulting in the mass extinction of other species (at a rate of
a hundred per day, according to some estimates). And if it isn’t
checked, human life will become more and more challenging, until we
suffer cataclysmic consequences.
Indigenous peoples have always recognized that we suffer from
ecopsychopathy, even if they would not have used that term. Almost from
the first moment Europeans arrived on their shores, Indians were
horrified by their exploitative attitude to the land, their
determination to tear up the surface of the earth to piece in their
search for resources and wealth. As Chief Seattle is reported to have
said in 1854, “His [the white man’s] appetite will devour the Earth and leave behind only a desert.”
Perhaps all is not lost though. Fortunately, there may be one
essential difference between ecopsychopathy and psychopathy. Most
psychologists believe that psychopathy is incurable. But this may not be
case with ecopsychopathy. Although our mainstream culture is afflicted
with ecopsychopathy, there are many millions of individuals who do feel a
strong sense of empathy to nature. As the protests at Standing Rock
have shown, many of us feel as horrified by our culture’s systematic
abuse of the natural world as Native Americans have always been.
Perhaps a cultural change is underway. Perhaps we are beginning to
remember something that other peoples have always known: that we don’t
live in the world, we are part of it. When we abuse nature, we are
really only abusing ourselves. We are connected to nature, whether we’re
aware of it or not. And our survival depends on being able to sense
this connection.
This conflict is significant because it exemplifies a condition which I call "ecopsychopathy." There are around 200 hundred classified forms of mental illness, and this is one I would like to add to the list. Ecopsychopathy can be described as a "lack of empathy, connection or sense of responsibility to the natural world, resulting in its abuse and exploitation."
The inability to empathise is the major characteristic of psychopathy. Psychopaths are emotionally disconnected from other people, who are just objects to them. They have no "fellow-feeling," no ability to feel pity or guilt. This makes it possible for them to commit acts of cruelty and exploitation which would be far beyond normal human beings. Since they have no feelings for others, there is nothing to stop them inflicting suffering on them, and exploiting them for their own devices.
This is a perfect description of our culture’s attitude to the natural world. Many of the world’s indigenous peoples feel a connection to nature which we "civilized" people seem to have lost. Indigenous people sense a sacredness in nature, feel that they share their being with it, and so are reluctant to harm it. This is typified by the Lakota holy man Black Elk, who said "Every step that we take upon the Earth should be done in a sacred manner; every step should be taken as a prayer." And it’s also exemplified by the Sioux people's opposition to the Dakota access pipeline.
On the other hand, the ecopsychopathic attitude of mainstream American culture sees nature as nothing more than a supply of resources. Natural things are objects. They only have value inasmuch they can supply us with raw materials. They aren’t alive, they aren’t sacred, and they don’t deserve our respect. We can’t empathize with nature, in the same way that psychopaths can’t empathize with other human beings.
The consequence of this disorder are enormous, massively outweighing those of any other psychological condition. On an immediate level, ecopsychopathy results in a degradation of our living environment which causes dislocation and unease. As the fields of ecopsychology and ecotherapy have shown, human beings feel a strong sense of connection to nature. We feel at home in it, because it’s been our home for hundreds of thousands of years. Contact with nature heals us. Lack of contact with nature harms us.
On a more macrocosmic level, ecopsychopathy threatens the survival of the human race. The end point of our exploitative and manipulative attitude towards the natural world is surely the complete disruption of the fragile eco-systems on which our life depends. This disruption is underway already, resulting in the mass extinction of other species (at a rate of a hundred per day, according to some estimates). And if it isn’t checked, human life will become more and more challenging, until we suffer cataclysmic consequences.
Indigenous peoples have always recognized that we suffer from ecopsychopathy, even if they would not have used that term. Almost from the first moment Europeans arrived on their shores, Indians were horrified by their exploitative attitude to the land, their determination to tear up the surface of the earth to piece in their search for resources and wealth. As Chief Seattle is reported to have said in 1854, “His [the white man’s] appetite will devour the Earth and leave behind only a desert.”
Perhaps all is not lost though. Fortunately, there may be one essential difference between ecopsychopathy and psychopathy. Most psychologists believe that psychopathy is incurable. But this may not be case with ecopsychopathy. Although our mainstream culture is afflicted with ecopsychopathy, there are many millions of individuals who do feel a strong sense of empathy to nature. As the protests at Standing Rock have shown, many of us feel as horrified by our culture’s systematic abuse of the natural world as Native Americans have always been.
Perhaps a cultural change is underway. Perhaps we are beginning to remember something that other peoples have always known: that we don’t live in the world, we are part of it. When we abuse nature, we are really only abusing ourselves. We are connected to nature, whether we’re aware of it or not. And our survival depends on being able to sense this connection.